Comments on: Scaffolds != Rails /2009/01/scaffolds-rails/ Sarah Allen's reflections on internet software and other topics Fri, 31 Aug 2012 03:28:42 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.1 By: Do Ruby on Rails Developers use Scaffolding? – The Blog of Kevin Miles /2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-365 Fri, 31 Aug 2012 03:28:42 +0000 /sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-365 […] Scaffolds != Rails – /sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/ “I’ve spent some time reading about scaffolding on the Rails lists, and have saved some enlightening posts from various folks..” In this post there are multiple highlights from different users on the internet and their views on the subject. It should be very helpful! […]

]]> By: Caffeine Driven Development » Blog Archive » L33t Links #71 /2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-364 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 06:55:06 +0000 /sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-364 […] Scaffolds != Rails […]

]]> By: Sarah /2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-363 Thu, 07 May 2009 00:02:02 +0000 /sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-363 Later in email, David & realized that he really did mean monogamous (e.g. one controller to one model), so I changed it back.

]]> By: Sarah /2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-362 Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:17:53 +0000 /sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-362 Hey David,

When I read it I was thinking you meant homogeneous. Funny when a word is out of place it is easy to fill in what you think it means. In any case, I made the correction. Thank for your comments on the list in the first place. I’ve enjoyed reading your notes on Rails.

Sarah

]]> By: David Black /2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-361 Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:08:28 +0000 /sarahblog/2009/01/scaffolds-rails/#comment-361 Wow, I really did say “too monogamous” instead of “too monolithic”, didn’t I? :-) I did mean monolithic, though.

David

]]>